{"id":9593,"date":"2021-07-29T22:03:35","date_gmt":"2021-07-29T20:03:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/iup.rs\/news\/vesti-iz-2021\/predstavnicima-pravosuda-predstavljena-uporedna-analiza-o-poverljivom-savetovanju-za-sudije-i-javne-tuzioce\/"},"modified":"2021-07-29T22:17:52","modified_gmt":"2021-07-29T20:17:52","slug":"comparative-analysis-coe","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/iup.rs\/en\/news\/vesti-iz-2021\/comparative-analysis-coe\/","title":{"rendered":"Comparative analysis on confidential counselling for judges and for public prosecutors presented to the Serbian judiciary"},"content":{"rendered":"

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]14 July 2021*<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n

Members of the Ethics Committees of the Serbian High Judicial Council and the State Prosecutorial Council were presented with the Analysis of systems of confidential counselling on ethical matters for judges and for public prosecutors<\/a><\/strong>. The Analysis contains a set of recommendations for policymakers on steps to be taken to introduce confidential counselling into Serbian judiciary.<\/p>\n

The Council of Europe Group of States against Corruption GRECO, in the 4th Evaluation Round which deals with corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors, made a recommendation to Serbian authorities that confidential counselling within the judiciary be provided for all categories of judges and public prosecutors. In that sense, the joint European Union\/Council of Europe action \u201cStrengthening independence and accountability of the judiciary<\/a>\u201d has put on disposal to both Councils the comparative analysis which examines the confidential counselling systems in a number of Council of Europe member-states, and beyond, in the US and the countries of Latin America. Drafting of the Analysis also included interviews with relevant stakeholders, including professional associations of judges and public prosecutors.<\/p>\n

The key issues addressed by the analysis concern the positioning of the confidential counselling mechanism within the justiciary, composition and appointment procedure of confidential counsellors, methods of work and the role of already existing Ethics Committees.<\/p>\n

The representatives of both Ethics Committees were impressed with the findings and agreed to formulate proposals for future steps to be taken by the High Judicial Council and the State Prosecutorial Council in order to ensure that confidential counselling on ethical matters becomes embedded in the Serbian judiciary. It was also agreed for these steps to be closely accompanied by the action.<\/p>\n

The authors of the analysis are judge Jos\u00e9 Manuel Duro Mateus Cardoso of the Appellate Court in Lisbon, a team of experts of the Belgrade-based Institute for Comparative Law and Mirjana Dokmanovic, who provided advice on antidiscrimination measures to be considered.<\/p>\n

The meeting was held under the action \u201cStrengthening independence and accountability of the judiciary\u201d which is part of the \u201cHorizontal Facility for the Western Balkans and Turkey 2019-2022\u201d, a co-operation initiative of the European Union and the Council of Europe, which aims at assisting beneficiaries in the Western Balkans region and Turkey to comply with the Council of Europe standards and European Union acquis in the framework of the enlargement process, where relevant.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][vc_separator color=”sandy_brown” align=”align_left” el_width=”10″][vc_column_text]*cover photo and text were retreived from the website of the Council of Europe<\/a>[\/vc_column_text]\n\t

\n\t\t

More News 2021<\/h2>\n\t\t<\/span>\n\t<\/div>\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\"\"<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

Publishing of the brochure on international standards for respect of the work of the judiciary by public officials<\/a><\/h3>\n\n\t\t\t\t

20 December 2021\r\n\r\nA brochure on international standards for respect of the work of the judiciary by public officials, co-authored by Ana Knezevic Bojovic, PhD senior research fellow at the Institute for Comparative Law.<\/p>\n\n\t\t\t\tRead more<\/a>\n\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\"\"<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

Milica Matijevi\u0107 (PhD) delievered series of lectures at Faculty of Law University of Florence<\/a><\/h3>\n\n\t\t\t\t

26 November 2021\r\n\r\nMilica V. Matijevi\u0107 (PhD), the Research Associate of the Institute of Comparative Law, last week has delivered three lectures about the legal systems of the Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries at the Faculty of Law of the University of Florence as a part of one-month research stay.<\/p>\n\n\t\t\t\tRead more<\/a>\n\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t

<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div>[\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

14 July 2021<\/p>\n

Members of the Ethics Committees of the Serbian High Judicial Council and the State Prosecutorial Council were presented with the Analysis of systems of confidential counselling on ethical matters for judges and for public prosecutors. The Analysis contains a set of recommendations for policymakers on steps to be taken to introduce confidential counselling into Serbian judiciary.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":9585,"parent":8002,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-9593","page","type-page","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"yoast_head":"\nComparative analysis on confidential counselling for judges and for public prosecutors presented to the Serbian judiciary - \u0418\u043d\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0442\u0443\u0442 \u0437\u0430 \u0443\u043f\u043e\u0440\u0435\u0434\u043d\u043e \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/iup.rs\/en\/news\/vesti-iz-2021\/comparative-analysis-coe\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Comparative analysis on confidential counselling for judges and for public prosecutors presented to the Serbian judiciary - \u0418\u043d\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0442\u0443\u0442 \u0437\u0430 \u0443\u043f\u043e\u0440\u0435\u0434\u043d\u043e \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"14 July 2021 Members of the Ethics Committees of the Serbian High Judicial Council and the State Prosecutorial Council were presented with the Analysis of systems of confidential counselling on ethical matters for judges and for public prosecutors. The Analysis contains a set of recommendations for policymakers on steps to be taken to introduce confidential counselling into Serbian judiciary.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/iup.rs\/en\/news\/vesti-iz-2021\/comparative-analysis-coe\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"\u0418\u043d\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0442\u0443\u0442 \u0437\u0430 \u0443\u043f\u043e\u0440\u0435\u0434\u043d\u043e \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-07-29T20:17:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/iup.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/20210714-confidential-counselling-analysis.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"870\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"489\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/iup.rs\/en\/news\/vesti-iz-2021\/comparative-analysis-coe\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/iup.rs\/en\/news\/vesti-iz-2021\/comparative-analysis-coe\/\",\"name\":\"Comparative analysis on confidential counselling for judges and for public prosecutors presented to the Serbian judiciary - \u0418\u043d\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0442\u0443\u0442 \u0437\u0430 \u0443\u043f\u043e\u0440\u0435\u0434\u043d\u043e \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/iup.rs\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/iup.rs\/en\/news\/vesti-iz-2021\/comparative-analysis-coe\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/iup.rs\/en\/news\/vesti-iz-2021\/comparative-analysis-coe\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/iup.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/20210714-confidential-counselling-analysis.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-07-29T20:03:35+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-07-29T20:17:52+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/iup.rs\/en\/news\/vesti-iz-2021\/comparative-analysis-coe\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/iup.rs\/en\/news\/vesti-iz-2021\/comparative-analysis-coe\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/iup.rs\/en\/news\/vesti-iz-2021\/comparative-analysis-coe\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/iup.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/20210714-confidential-counselling-analysis.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/iup.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/20210714-confidential-counselling-analysis.jpg\",\"width\":870,\"height\":489},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/iup.rs\/en\/news\/vesti-iz-2021\/comparative-analysis-coe\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"\u041f\u043e\u0447\u0435\u0442\u043d\u0430\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/iup.rs\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"News\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/iup.rs\/en\/news\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"News 2021\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/iup.rs\/en\/news\/vesti-iz-2021\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":4,\"name\":\"Comparative analysis on confidential counselling for judges and for public prosecutors presented to the Serbian judiciary\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/iup.rs\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/iup.rs\/\",\"name\":\"\u0418\u043d\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0442\u0443\u0442 \u0437\u0430 \u0443\u043f\u043e\u0440\u0435\u0434\u043d\u043e \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/iup.rs\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/iup.rs\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/iup.rs\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Institut za uporedno pravo\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/iup.rs\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/iup.rs\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/iup.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/IUP-logo-4-3-gif.gif\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/iup.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/IUP-logo-4-3-gif.gif\",\"width\":128,\"height\":96,\"caption\":\"Institut za uporedno pravo\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/iup.rs\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Comparative analysis on confidential counselling for judges and for public prosecutors presented to the Serbian judiciary - \u0418\u043d\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0442\u0443\u0442 \u0437\u0430 \u0443\u043f\u043e\u0440\u0435\u0434\u043d\u043e \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/iup.rs\/en\/news\/vesti-iz-2021\/comparative-analysis-coe\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Comparative analysis on confidential counselling for judges and for public prosecutors presented to the Serbian judiciary - \u0418\u043d\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0442\u0443\u0442 \u0437\u0430 \u0443\u043f\u043e\u0440\u0435\u0434\u043d\u043e \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e","og_description":"14 July 2021 Members of the Ethics Committees of the Serbian High Judicial Council and the State Prosecutorial Council were presented with the Analysis of systems of confidential counselling on ethical matters for judges and for public prosecutors. The Analysis contains a set of recommendations for policymakers on steps to be taken to introduce confidential counselling into Serbian judiciary.","og_url":"https:\/\/iup.rs\/en\/news\/vesti-iz-2021\/comparative-analysis-coe\/","og_site_name":"\u0418\u043d\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0442\u0443\u0442 \u0437\u0430 \u0443\u043f\u043e\u0440\u0435\u0434\u043d\u043e \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e","article_modified_time":"2021-07-29T20:17:52+00:00","og_image":[{"width":870,"height":489,"url":"https:\/\/iup.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/20210714-confidential-counselling-analysis.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/iup.rs\/en\/news\/vesti-iz-2021\/comparative-analysis-coe\/","url":"https:\/\/iup.rs\/en\/news\/vesti-iz-2021\/comparative-analysis-coe\/","name":"Comparative analysis on confidential counselling for judges and for public prosecutors presented to the Serbian judiciary - \u0418\u043d\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0442\u0443\u0442 \u0437\u0430 \u0443\u043f\u043e\u0440\u0435\u0434\u043d\u043e \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/iup.rs\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/iup.rs\/en\/news\/vesti-iz-2021\/comparative-analysis-coe\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/iup.rs\/en\/news\/vesti-iz-2021\/comparative-analysis-coe\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/iup.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/20210714-confidential-counselling-analysis.jpg","datePublished":"2021-07-29T20:03:35+00:00","dateModified":"2021-07-29T20:17:52+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/iup.rs\/en\/news\/vesti-iz-2021\/comparative-analysis-coe\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/iup.rs\/en\/news\/vesti-iz-2021\/comparative-analysis-coe\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/iup.rs\/en\/news\/vesti-iz-2021\/comparative-analysis-coe\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/iup.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/20210714-confidential-counselling-analysis.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/iup.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/20210714-confidential-counselling-analysis.jpg","width":870,"height":489},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/iup.rs\/en\/news\/vesti-iz-2021\/comparative-analysis-coe\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"\u041f\u043e\u0447\u0435\u0442\u043d\u0430","item":"https:\/\/iup.rs\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"News","item":"https:\/\/iup.rs\/en\/news\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"News 2021","item":"https:\/\/iup.rs\/en\/news\/vesti-iz-2021\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":4,"name":"Comparative analysis on confidential counselling for judges and for public prosecutors presented to the Serbian judiciary"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/iup.rs\/#website","url":"https:\/\/iup.rs\/","name":"\u0418\u043d\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0442\u0443\u0442 \u0437\u0430 \u0443\u043f\u043e\u0440\u0435\u0434\u043d\u043e \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/iup.rs\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/iup.rs\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/iup.rs\/#organization","name":"Institut za uporedno pravo","url":"https:\/\/iup.rs\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/iup.rs\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/iup.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/IUP-logo-4-3-gif.gif","contentUrl":"https:\/\/iup.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/IUP-logo-4-3-gif.gif","width":128,"height":96,"caption":"Institut za uporedno pravo"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/iup.rs\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"publishpress_future_action":{"enabled":false,"date":"2026-09-21 13:54:38","action":"change-status","newStatus":"draft","terms":[],"taxonomy":""},"publishpress_future_workflow_manual_trigger":{"enabledWorkflows":[]},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/iup.rs\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/9593","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/iup.rs\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/iup.rs\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iup.rs\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iup.rs\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9593"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/iup.rs\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/9593\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9596,"href":"https:\/\/iup.rs\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/9593\/revisions\/9596"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iup.rs\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/8002"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iup.rs\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9585"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/iup.rs\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9593"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}