[vc_row][vc_column][vc_single_image image=”15662″ img_size=”full” alignment=”center”][vc_tta_tabs active_section=”3″ pagination_style=”flat-rounded”][vc_tta_section i_type=”openiconic” i_icon_openiconic=”vc-oi vc-oi-info” add_icon=”true” title=”About” tab_id=”Aboutdigi”][vc_column_text]This conference promises to be a landmark event, bringing together leading minds to explore the impact of digitalization on legal jurisdiction.<\/p>\n
The digital era has fundamentally challenged traditional legal frameworks, particularly in terms of jurisdiction within the judiciary. Our conference seeks to address these challenges, focusing on the evolution of jurisdictional concepts, the balance of powers, and the digital technologies’ implications on due process and jurisdictional limits. Key themes include the transition from the French to the American model of judicial valorization, the integration of AI and electronic procedures in legal processes, and the global internet’s role in redefining legal boundaries.<\/p>\n
This event will provide a comprehensive platform for dialogue among legal scholars, practitioners, and policymakers, aiming to deepen our understanding of jurisdiction in the digital age and to identify pathways forward. Through keynote speeches, panel discussions, and collaborative sessions, participants will gain valuable insights into adapting legal systems to the realities of the digital world, ensuring justice, fairness, and the rule of law.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section i_icon_fontawesome=”fa fa-calendar” add_icon=”true” title=”Important dates” tab_id=”dates”][vc_column_text]16 August 2024 \u2013 Early bird registration<\/p>\n
9 September 2024 \u2013 Registration deadline<\/p>\n
27 September 2024 \u2013 Abstract submission deadline<\/p>\n
12 September 2024 \u2013 Conference<\/p>\n
18 October 2024 \u2013 Abstract acceptance confirmation<\/p>\n
15 February 2025 \u2013 Paper submission[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section i_icon_fontawesome=”fa fa-wpforms” add_icon=”true” title=”Programme” tab_id=”prog”][vc_column_text]Revisiting the Concept of Jurisdiction in the Digital Era<\/strong><\/p>\n 12th September, 2024<\/p>\n University of Belgrade Rectorate<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Programme<\/strong><\/p>\n The proposed debate will seek to understand how the concept of jurisdiction, in different legal traditions, has been altered at the threshold of the transformations of the Digital Age. To do so, panelists have been prompted to reflect on this flow of changes, utilizing a deductive vertical axis that seeks perceptions from different layers of approximation, aiding in understanding how the law behaves in these moments of transformation. From a conception of law as an institutional practice that combines ideas, legal categories, and actions, the symposium will seek to organize presentations across these three different layers of reflection. In summary, the focus is, through concrete comparison between different legal traditions, to analyze how long-term, medium-term, and short-term legal structures behave in moments of radical change\u2014such as the current Digital Age.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Panel 01 \u2013 First Axis<\/strong><\/p>\n Long-Term Transformations: The Making of Legal Institutions – Legal Ideas, Legal Theory, and Constitutional Framework<\/strong><\/p>\n The first panel will seek to comprehend how the development of juridical notions that influence legal institutions contributes to the theme of jurisdictional modeling. Here we will seek to analyze how fundamental principles from legal theory and the long-term history of constitutional development affect legal tradition during moments of transformation, helping to shape varied perspectives of the concept of jurisdiction.<\/p>\n Panel 02 – Second Axis<\/strong><\/p>\n Medium-Term Transformations: Contemporary Procedural Legal Categories<\/strong><\/p>\n In this second axis, the panelists will demonstrate how procedural institutions react to changes in the concept of jurisdiction. Debates on the formation of procedural jurisdiction in the three branches of government, the architecture of jurisdictional rules, and contemporary trends in proceduralism will seek to demonstrate how legal systems evolve in moments of extreme change, such as those brought about by the current Digital Age.<\/p>\n Panel 03 – Third Axis<\/strong><\/p>\n Short-Term Transformations: Law in Action from the Perspective of the Brazilian and Serbian Jurisdictional Systems<\/strong><\/p>\n Building on insights gained from the structural dynamics of the legal field discussed in Panels 01 and 02, the speakers will analyze specific domestic adjudicative structures within these institutions. The goal is to demonstrate how law practice shapes the transformations occurring in the macro dimensions of legal rationality and its classical procedural categories, particularly within the theme of jurisdiction.<\/p>\n Confirmed Speakers and moderators:<\/strong><\/p>\n Prof. Du\u0161an Popovi\u0107, Ph.D, Full Professor, University of Belgrade Faculty of Law<\/p>\n Prof. Jelena Vu\u010dkovi\u0107, PhD, Member of the High Judicial Council, Full Professor, University of Kragujevac Faculty of Law<\/p>\n Prof. Milan \u0160kuli\u0107, Ph.D, Deputy President of the Constitutional Court<\/p>\n Prof. Vladan Petrov, Ph.D, Full Professor, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Law<\/p>\n Prof. Maja Nasti\u0107, Ph.D, Full Professor, University of Ni\u0161, Faculty of Law<\/p>\n Miroslav \u0110or\u0111evi\u0107, Ph.D, Vice President of the High Prosecutorial Council, Republic of Serbia<\/p>\n Jasmina Stankovi\u0107, LLM, Prosecutor, Supreme Public Prosecution Office, Republic of Serbia<\/p>\n Branko Stani\u0107, Justice, Supreme Court, Republic of Serbia<\/p>\n Jelena Dereti\u0107, Assistant Minister, Ministry of Justice, Republic of Serbia<\/p>\n Marija Aran\u0111elovi\u0107 Jure\u0161a, Member of the High Judicial Council, Judge, Higher Court in Belgrade, Anti-Corruption Department<\/p>\n Prof. Fernando Menezes de Almeida, Ph.D, Full Professor, University of S\u00e3o Paulo, Brazil (https:\/\/direito.usp.br\/)<\/p>\n Prof. Flavio Yarshell, Ph.D, Full Professor, University of S\u00e3o Paulo, Ph.D, Brazil (https:\/\/direito.usp.br\/)<\/p>\n Prof. Paulo Henrique Rodrigues Pereira, Ph.D, University of S\u00e3o Paulo, Brazil (https:\/\/direito.usp.br\/)<\/p>\n Fernanda F. Fernandez Jankov, PhD, University of S\u00e3o Paulo (post-doctoral programme), Brazil (https:\/\/direito.usp.br\/)<\/p>\n Rodrigo Cadore, Ph.D, University of Freiburg, Germany<\/p>\n Alessandro Diaferia, Appellate Judge, Federal High Court of S\u00e3o Paulo 3rd Circuit, Brazil (https:\/\/www.trf3.jus.br\/); Vice-president, Federal Judges of Brazil Association (AJUFE –\u00a0www.ajufe.org.br<\/a>)<\/p>\n Scientific Committee<\/strong><\/p>\n Prof. Fernando Menezes de Almeida, Ph.D, Full Professor, University of S\u00e3o Paulo, Brazil (https:\/\/direito.usp.br\/)<\/p>\n Prof. Flavio Yarshell, Ph.D, Full Professor, University of S\u00e3o Paulo, Ph.D, Brazil (https:\/\/direito.usp.br\/)<\/p>\n Prof. Paulo Henrique Rodrigues Pereira, Ph.D, University of S\u00e3o Paulo, Brazil (https:\/\/direito.usp.br\/)<\/p>\n Fernanda F. Fernandez Jankov, PhD, University of S\u00e3o Paulo (post-doctoral programme), Brazil (https:\/\/direito.usp.br\/)<\/p>\n Alessandro Diaferia, Appellate Judge, Federal High Court of S\u00e3o Paulo 3rd Circuit, Brazil (https:\/\/www.trf3.jus.br\/); Vice-president, Federal Judges of Brazil Association (AJUFE –\u00a0www.ajufe.org.br<\/a>)[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section i_icon_fontawesome=”fa fa-home” add_icon=”true” title=”Organizers” tab_id=”Orgdigi”][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/2″][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n [\/vc_column_text][vc_single_image image=”15653″][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/2″][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n [\/vc_column_text][vc_single_image image=”15878″][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section i_icon_fontawesome=”fa fa-envelope-o” add_icon=”true” title=”Contact” tab_id=”digicont2″][vc_column_text]<\/p>\nInstitute of comparative law<\/pre>\n
Faculty of Law<\/pre>\n